The people who write songs for the musical theater are thrilled when someone likes their work enough to want to buy copies of the sheet music.
Did you catch the key word in that first line? The word is "buy." People who write music for a living earn that living by selling the music -- which includes the musical notation we generally call sheet music.
However, chalk up another glitch in this digital age. Composers are finding more and more cases of unauthorized people putting copies of their sheet music online for free distribution. That, my friends, is a violation of copyright law, and the music writers are steamed about this form of Internet piracy that's doing them out of the proceeds they're entitled to receive for their labors.
This was the topic of one of the panel discussions at this past weekend's national conference of the Dramatists Guild of America, held here in the D.C. area. Theatrical music writers Georgia Stitt and Craig Carnelia, who are also members of a special committee created to deal with the piracy sitatuation, talked about the issue before a highly interested group of people who sat in the audience. The problem is exacerbated by a public that seems to perceive the Internet as a free buffet. Almost anything they come across online is just a click away from downloading and printing. And, if there's free sheet music available at the flick of an index finger, how many are going to spend money to get the same thing? The result -- the songwriters are losing a substantial portion of their income.
Among the things the panel and its audience discussed as possible solutions were: (1) greater education to make the public aware that unauthorized online sharing of sheet music amounts to theft, and (2) advancing technology to guard against internet piracy.
I disagree at least somewhat with those who say further education of the public is the real answer here, because I believe there might be a general perception that Internet theft of a few pages of sheet music (an item that often retails for less than five bucks) is roughly akin to swiping a few grapes off the produce aisle in a supermarket -- a relatively tolerable petty theft in the minds of many. (You know how that defense goes: "Hey, c'mon! Lighten up! It's just a grape! It's not like I was stealing a turkey!")
So that leaves me with the "advanced technology" option, which I believe is going to be the ultimate answer -- although I've currently no idea how that answer will eventually manifest itself.
Beginning tomorrow (Thursday, June 9, 2011) the Dramatists Guild of America will hold its first ever national conference on playwriting, and it will hold it in northern Virginia, just outside of Washington, D.C. Among the topics to be covered are some of the legal issues that are near and dear to my heart -- things like fair use, contracting, and subsidiary rights. These are the business aspects of playwriting about which most playwrights have little to no knowledge.
I've lectured on these topics in the past, but I won't be delivering these presentations. The sessions will be conducted by the Guild's executive director for business affairs, Ralph Sevush, who is a lawyer, along with David Faux, who is also in the Guild's legal department.
You don't have to be a Guild member to attend the conference. But you do have to register. More information, including the schedule of events, can be found at the Dramatists Guild website.
Let there be dancing in the streets...just not at the Thomas Jefferson Memorial.
A group of people were arrested last weekend for dancing in the famed Washington, D.C., landmark. Officially, they were hauled in for conducting a public demonstration at the Jefferson Memorial without a permit. It didn't take long after the dancing began for the Park Police to "cut in," so to speak.
Check out the video at YouTube, and you be the judge.
If you're planning on seeing the new movie, The Hangover 2 -- which I must admit I'm not -- there's apparently a scene in which a character wakes up from a drunken stupor to discover he has a tattoo on his face. If the tattoo looks familiar, it might be because it resembles the one prize fighter Mike Tyson has on his own face in real life. And guess what? The tattoo artist who created Mr. Tyson's tattoo is suing the movie's producers for copyright infringement on the design.
According to a story in the Wrap, the artist, S. Victor Whitmill, has scored at least a partial victory because, while the judge refused his motion for an injunction to prevent the film's distribution, the judge also suggested that Mr. Whitmill's claims seem strong.
And why shouldn't a tattoo have the same copyright protections as any other graphic creation? You can argue the artistic merits of certain visual works -- whether they be applied to canvas, paper, or even skin. But that doesn't mean they don't fall under the protective realm of copyright laws.
Yes, copyright law is supposed to benefit society by encouraging people to create works of artistic merit that then enrich the world through their distribution. But sometimes the results of copyright can be the exact opposite of that intended goal. Case in point, there's a newly discovered collection of recordings made of live performances of the swing era that includes many jazz greats performing the longer works that wouldn't have fit on the 78 RPM record discs of the time. Following the owner's death, the collection came into the hands of the National Jazz Museum of Harlem.
"Hooray!" you jazz fans exclaim. "Now we'll get to hear these recordings once they're released to the public."
But not so fast. Apparently, the museum isn't planning on releasing them. That's not because it wouldn't like to do that. It's because tracking down the music's copyright owners and securing all the necessary permissions to release these decades-old recordings could prove a colossal task for the museum, and one it's not prepared to undertake.
You can learn more by reading the article in the American Bar Association's ABA Journal. And, just as intriguing to me... If you want a good example of just how complicated copyright law can get, check out the legal debate in the comments at the end of the article.